Skip to content

Equitable Impact for Every Student

ST Math has demonstrated repeatable learning gains from Kindergarten through middle school across multiple nationally recognized assessments, including i-Ready, MAP®/RIT, and Star.

These findings show consistent impact across every grade level—not just in a single study, or at a single district, but on all students, not a select group.

More than half of students believe they aren’t “math people.” This perception highlights the critical need for meaningful engagement and outcomes for all learners. 

At MIND Education, we create environments rooted in brain-based learning principles that foster deep understanding, critical thinking, and problem-solving—aligning with how every human brain is naturally designed to learn.



Our patented, evidence-based approach shifts traditional math learning from rote memorization to meaningful, conceptual understanding. ST Math reaches students of all levels and abilities, engaging them in ways that build confidence and mastery. The result? Proven gains in math comprehension and state assessment scores.

Our national research includes schools from every corner of the country, representing the full spectrum of ST Math implementation. This allows us to study districts with diverse needs and contexts, consistently demonstrating the same pattern of success: ST Math boosts math scores at all performance levels.

Whether your district is urban, rural, high-performing, or under-resourced, our research shows that ST Math works. Don’t see a study matching your district type? Reach out, and we’ll provide data tailored to your unique context.

High Need

  • 0.67 z-score effect size*
  • 81 schools
  • 9,432  students
  • 16  states

 AL, AZ, CA, CO, FL, IA, IL, LA, MA, MO, MS, NM, NV, NY, UT, WI

Study

Low Need

  • 0.26  z-score effect size*
  • 
69  schools
  • 
9,999  students
  • 
13  states

AZ, CA, IA, IL, MA, MT, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OH, UT, VA

Study

High Performing

  • 0.87 z-score effect size*
  • 57 schools
  • 6,681  students
  • 14 states

AR, AZ, CA, FL, IA, IL, MA, MT, NV, NY, PA, TX, UT, VA

Study

Low Performing

  • 0.98 z-score effect size*
  • 41 schools
  • 3,576 students
  • 13 states

AR, CA, CT, FL, IA, MA, MO, MT, NH, TX, UT, VA, WI

Study

Rural District

  • 0.53 z-score effect size*
  • 76 schools
  • 7,721 students
  • 18 states

 AZ, CA, CO, GA, IA, MA, MI, MN, MO, NC, NJ, NV, NY, OH, PA, TX, UT, VA  

Study

Large District

  • 0.34 z-score effect size*
  • 307 schools
  • 50,211 students
  • 16  states 

 AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, GA, IL, LA, MA, MD, NM, NV, NY, TX, UT, WI

Study

Small District

  • 0.54 

  z-score effect size*
  • 45  schools
  • 3,070 students ✝

  • 12  states 

AZ, CA, IA, IN, MI, MN, NJ, NV, NY, PA, TX, UT

Study

Charter School

  • 0.65      z-score effect size*
  • 23  schools
  • 2,590 students
  • 7 states

CA, FL, LA, MA, MO, NY, UT

Study

High English Learner

  • 0.24      z-score effect size*
  • 77 schools
  • 11,870 students
  • 5 states 

AL, AZ, CA, CO, FL, IA, IL, LA, MA, MO, MS, NM, NV, NY, UT, WI

Study

High Hispanic Enrollment

  • 0.44        z-score effect size*
  • 102 schools
  • 12,907 students ✝
  • 13 states 

AR, AZ, CA, CO, IL, MA, NJ, NM, NV, NY, TX, UT, WI

Study

High African American Enrollment

  • 0.26     z-score effect size*
  • 67 schools
  • 11,218  students ✝
  • 17 states 

AL, CA, CT, FL, GA, IA, IL, LA, MA, MO, MS, NC, NJ, NV, NY, TX, VA

Study

*Statistically significant. †Analyzed by grade-level datasets.

I’m encouraged to see that ST Math continues to show significant effects on math achievement. But I’m even more impressed with the breadth of ST Math evaluations towards evaluating every school, every year, which provides a model for other educational technology companies to follow.

Tonika Cheek Clayton, Managing Partner, New Schools Venture Funds